Home › Forums › Heavens Best Forum › New Logo & Related Items › Commercials
- This topic has 31 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by FL18.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 27, 2006 at 2:25 pm #146748CJonesParticipant
Well the good thing is – this does NOT apply to us! Also one of the reasons I picked HB was the lack of sales-based royalties. Been there, done that. Advertising royalties often go higher than you think, although the national rates published appear low. For example with our Subway franchises we were required to pay 2.5% weekly to advertising on the national level – but – the kicker is that local markets soon realize that equates to minimum exposure and elect to pay more to ‘support’ the campaign regionally. Once the local coop votes – majority rules – then all have their rates raised within the market. Our rates for the Central Texas region were at 5% paid weekly (2.5 nat’l + 2.5 local). This was in addition to any other local level stuff you wanted to do. Many franchises publish minimum rates for such royalties, but the reality is most go higher! Sales reports are submitted electronically, and the royalties are sucked from your account via ACH immediately! And this was in ADDITION to an 8% regular royalty!! Many weeks our total royalties for a week exceeded $1500!! It’s like a legal MAFIA!! We do NOT want that, trust me!! Thank You for the HB system!!!
June 27, 2006 at 2:42 pm #146749hbottumwaParticipantI do know that Service Master (Disaster) charges 10% for most things and 15% for somethings. (their monthly reports are a real pain, allot of record keeping) I go to Rotary with the guy who services all of Eastern Oregon. He’s always complaining about these fees. Chem Dry tells you what van you will operate from in each area, and fines owners for not doing what coperate wants, when and how. ( I know because I WAS a “chem’re” and witnessed it ) Heavens Best simply lives up to it’s name! I have been cleaning since Feb of 82. (before allot of you were born) I realize most Heaven’s Best owners and operators have no idea how good they really have it.
June 27, 2006 at 5:44 pm #146750pachecoParticipantI realize how well we have had it Gordon…and appreciate it very, very much. And Ron, the advertising fees were taken out of the overall percentage paid, I believe. I worked for Service Master and it was a terrible mess inside the office. They lost their franchise about a year after I left.
June 28, 2006 at 3:06 am #146751tx45ParticipantI would be all for putting money into corporate for some national advertising (television, radio, magazines, etc.). I think the amount of money contributed from each franchise should be a flat fee based upon the population or licensed areas of each franchise.
June 28, 2006 at 3:08 am #146752AnonymousInactiveI’m down!
June 30, 2006 at 1:44 am #146753CJonesParticipantI think the best we could probably come up with might be some magazine ads – which is why I’m NOT in favor of this. Plain & simple… not enough return on the dollar! It takes mega bucks to play in this game & I’d rather keep on track like we are – let’s keep corporate developing new ad materials for us to use on the local/regional level!!!!
June 30, 2006 at 2:22 am #146754AnonymousInactiveIf corporate does implement a franchise advertising fee then I’m ok with it. Jeff, it sounds like you were not in favor of the way Subway ran their national advertising. Subway doesn’t not equal Heaven’s Best. I’m quite sure that our advertising would be much different than that of Subway. Different demographic, different advertising model. I think that we could structure our advertising in such a way that it would greatly benefit all operators.
June 30, 2006 at 9:16 pm #146755CJonesParticipantNo, actually I think Subway has an excellent advertising system which is well represented by franchissees. The point I’m making in this forum is that it takes millions…I’m talking millions… of dollars to make a minor buzz in the national market place. We together collectively simply don’t have the numbers to even make a squeak in the market. However, ad development for us to purchase and use locally, such as cable in a region, might be a good starting place. And, as I said before I really don’t think we could even make a dent on the national tv market – unless you have the $ to play with the big dogs then don’t waste the money!! Lastly, one of the reasons I chose HB was the lack of sales based royalties of any kind. This kind of business is very different and I think better managed on a local level for advertising effectiveness and return on the dollar spent. Hey btw Ron – looks like you guys have been having a brutal, hot summer, eh? Got your swimming pool in yet? I’m thinkin’ about one right about NOW!!! haha
June 30, 2006 at 11:01 pm #146756AnonymousInactiveAs I stated in an earlier post to this thread, I like the current arrangement we have, which allows us to manage our advertising locally and at the pace we feel comfortable with.
I think it is easy to get excited about a national ad campaign and have the idea that it would be great. However, I have learned that advertising people rarely know any more than I do about marketing/advertising. I ran some ads early on that produced virtually zero response and they were laid out as my representative recommended. I get calls all the time from advertising reps (we all do) and I have recently (last 6 months or so) started accepting most of their invitations for lunch and to listen to their pitch. I also started asking questions about their background and experience. I have only met one with very much experience (more than a year).
In a previous career, I was part of the leadership of a small company (nearly $70 million in the bank and millions in revenue) and watched it spend a small fortune on marketing staff and advertising. Did we ever see decent results from our ads? Usually not. If we had, I might not be typing this now. Of course I’m happy to be here, but I might not have researched self-employment and Heaven’s Best.
How many of you have seen the supposedly wonderful statistics concerning ROI (return on investment) from advertising? If it was as easy as those statistics would have you believe, we wouldn’t have this thread going because we would all be rolling in the dough from our ads;)
Another question – overall, how many of you are really happy with your advertising results? If you are, I am happy for you. If not, why would you want to send a bunch of money to Rexburg and hope our corporate office doesn’t get taken advantage of by a smooth talking advertising salesperson?
In order for Cody and his staff to stand a decent chance of getting good service for their money spent, they would have to hire one or more high-powered marketing person(s). I wonder how many really successful marketing executives would want to relocate to Rexburg? (No offense Cody – I like Rexburg, but it isn’t the big time for an upwardly ambitious marketing/advertising person). If they found a willing soul, they would easily command six figures+ if they are really good with a proven track record.
As Jeff Miller said, it would take loads of money.
Also, how many times have we heard Cody talk about how an ad works well in one location and not at all in another city? I don’t know how much that proves to be true, but I’ve heard it from Cody a lot. So then, perhaps we would require many variations of ads or many completely different ads for different areas of the country. I suspect there are actually underlying reasons for the inconsistent results we all see, such as average income, age demographics, amount of competition, etc. If it is even possible, it would require a detailed study (as in expensive) to figure out those reasons. Back to Jeff’s point – loads of money!
As a small business owner, I have come to think of the advertising as a necessary evil similar to insurance. However, you get peace of mind from the insurance money you pay. All I get is stress from the advertising money I pay. I have yet to receive a really nice return from an ad.
There is nothing exact or scientific about marketing/advertising. There is a lot of instinct, guessing, luck, etc. that goes into good results. We all know it takes a lot of trial and error to find what works. I have no interest in sending a bunch of money to Rexburg so that they can begin their search for some magical ad. If we ever head down that path, there will be no stopping. At least we can take pause and re-group now concerning our ads. If we begin sending an advertising royalty and let Rexburg handle a bunch of money for us, there won’t be a pause if they stumble – we will continue to send our money.
Let’s take the new website project as an example of a centralized effort that affects us all. Based on posts to this forum, I gurantee we are not all happy with the new site from a content perspective. Also, look at how they actually performed the transition – on our live server – can you believe it? Tyler at his ripe old age of ?? (I would guess early 20s) knows better than to do that. Tyler’s gut instinct to bring the new site up on a test server, check it, review it, etc., then cutover to it live was exactly what they should have done. But the outsourced staff, with superb credentials that they showed Cody and staff I’m sure, blew it. We all survived the transition of course, but we weren’t all happy with the results.
(Side note to Cody: Please don’t take this as a gripe about the new web site or how it was handled. With my background, I have seen that kind of transition so often that I simple chuckle now. Unfortunately, most paid techies don’t have Tyler’s instincts. I’m just using the new site as an example of how a centrally managed project at Rexburg stands very little chance of pleasing all of us operators.)
I would expect to see a similar marketing effort if Rexburg begins handling our advertising royalties for us. They would be wined and dined by several marketing companies with supposedly wonderful credentials, they would select someone from among the contenders, and then we better start praying. I would be willing to bet a lot that the end result would not please a real high percentage of us. Perhaps some of us would be happy to be sure, but I would expect to see this forum at a new level of activity that we have never experienced and not all of it positive.
Also, we are not all interested in growing bigger. Sure, we all would like to see Heaven’s Best expand and continue to grow as a company and franchise system. However, many of us only want to be a one man (or woman) van or one family van. Many of those same operators are doing just fine concerning their revenue. Why would they want to begin sending in an advertising royalty. I personally want to have several vans out there, but I know that is not true for a large percentage of our operators.
One last note – of those (Gordon and Jeff – hope I didn’t miss anyone) who have actually been there/done that with respect to being in a franchise system and contributing advertising royalties and have posted to this thread, none of their posts was positive about it.
Thanks for listening!
Mike
July 1, 2006 at 1:40 pm #146757Ca22ParticipantMike I want to thank you for taking the time to explain in detail your view. I agree with you that this does not sound like a place that I want to see us go in the near future. I think that it sounds great and I am sure everyone would be excited to see a spot on tv or news print, but BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR.
Mike was right that most HB owners are a family buisness. They like the flexability and dont want the stress and overhead of a mega operation. I run four emplyees full time plus myself, a secratary three days a week along with my wife. We have 1200 ft of shop space and a small office that Is not located at the house. With this I have a good sive of overhead to pay out. I Have built this with out the use of a lot of advertising. I am nervus that our first full page ad hits in the small yellow page book this week and we will have a hard time to keep up. I like to keep my advertising cost at under 3% for the year.
If we started having national advertising we would have to have good ads in all seven or eight local phone books just like coit and sears does. Otherwise it would be advertising that is wasted. Have you ever seen a add on TV, but then not be able to find them in the book. This would mean that we would all have to be ready to expand our buisness. During the peak of the year I would have to double our size and in the off season for residental lay off employees.
We all have the potental to be as large or small as we want. This is what I love about Heavens Best and why I bought in to it six years ago. If I wanted to grow in to ten trucks I can, If you like to be a one or two truck opperation than you are just as succesfull.
I am very excited that the company is growing. With every franchise sold we gain market awareness. If you do not have a franchise in every city around you then start reffering people to fill those voids and tell the state owner to step it up a notch. Pull up California on the find an operator. We do have a state wide presence that is strong. This to me is the best form of national advertising, and it is FREE.
July 1, 2006 at 2:23 pm #146758AnonymousInactiveThe two companies in my area that have national ads behind them are Stanley and Serv-Pro. They are at the bottom in my area and change owners about once a year! National ads and billboards are very expensive and when mandatory advertising expense starts running too high and you have NO control you can’t make enough money and you go belly up!
The ideal company, in my opinion, (with profit being the #1 goal) would be to grow business every year and decrease all expenses every year.July 1, 2006 at 5:21 pm #146759hbottumwaParticipantIf anything I would recommend corporate sharing TV ads (for example) with us from those who have gone that route. Maybe we could add a phone # and special if desired at the end of the ad, and WE STILL HAVE CONTROL in OUR area. It seems to be the best of both worlds. We pay only what we use and still have full control.
July 1, 2006 at 10:09 pm #146760CJonesParticipantThat’s exactly right! Our system is great the way it is. It would be a good idea however if corporate wanted to invest in developing and producing a radio and a tv spot which we could then utilize – perhaps even for a “users fee” (which would recoup the investment of production). These types of ads could allow for a ‘tag’ or a ‘donut’ with space to put local phone numbers etc. One of the great things about HB is definitely in local control of advertising spending. Corporate is providing a professional image with a new logo and related materials for flyers, cards, etc. Producing radio and tv spots would just add to our warchest! But, just as we have a choice to buy flyers or cards, etc…. we should be able to choose to utilize electronic media. Royalties of any kind are a negative for this business in my opinion as stated before! Thanks for all the great input on this topic – I think this is how we grow into a focused company!
July 2, 2006 at 5:19 pm #146761AnonymousInactiveGreat topic Jeff. One of the ‘tools’ I would love to have is a nice, professional commercial for my local TV. This way, we could use it when we want and as frequently as we wish. Ad the local ‘tag’ and we’re in business. I think this sort of production will happen in the future. Several ads to choose from would even be better!
July 2, 2006 at 6:10 pm #146762pachecoParticipantdsmall is exactly on the money in my opinion. My sentiments exactly. Many of you are, I assume, who have been in the business 10+ years, I suppose grossing in the order of $200-$800k/ year and at that level, kicking a number of $$$ in TV commercials makes some sense. maybe.
Our thought from day one was to grow slowly and steadily building a solid base of repeat and referral customers. Not to grow fast.
We are right now going to go after the commercial customer to flesh out the early evening work in order to capitalize on our one USP.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.